Marketing and Social Media; Why They Matter
I had this forwarded to me and I was extremely amused but at the same time I could relate to it. All most every boss I have ever had (either consulting or a permanent gig) always wants to come in and change the world overnight. Let’s just say with such ambitions come mistakes and here is a really good example of why you should get the facts and think things through before taking action on anything.
Arcelor-Mittal Steel, feeling it was time for a shakeup, hired a new CEO.
The new boss was determined to rid the company of all slackers.
On a tour of the facilities, the CEO noticed a guy leaning against a wall.
The room was full of workers and he wanted to let them know that he meant
business. He asked the guy, “How much money do you make a week?”
A little surprised, the young man looked at him and said, “I make $400 a
week.. Why?”
The CEO said, “Wait right here.” He walked back to his office, came back in
two minutes, and handed the guy $1,600 in cash and said, “Here’s four weeks’
pay. Now GET OUT and don’t come back.”
Feeling pretty good about himself, the CEO looked around the room and asked,
“Does anyone want to tell me what that goof-ball did here?”
From across the room a voice said, “Pizza delivery guy from Domino’s.”
Faced with increasing pressure from Washington, the Interactive Advertising Bureau launched a public service campaign on Thursday aimed at educating consumers about behavioral targeting.
The online campaign, created pro bono by WPP’s Schematic, features rich media banner ads with copy like “Advertising is creepy” and “Hey, this banner can tell where you live. Mind if we come over and sell you stuff?”
More than one dozen publishers — including Microsoft, Google’s YouTube, and AOL — have committed to donate a combined 500 million impressions for the initiative.
The campaign comes as policymakers are questioning whether data collection by marketers violates consumers’ privacy. Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.) has said he plans to introduce a bill that could require Web companies to notify users about online ad targeting, and in some circumstances, obtain their explicit consent.
In addition, the Federal Trade Commission has criticized the industry for using dense privacy policies to inform people about behavioral targeting, or tracking people online and sending them ads based on sites visited.
In a meeting with reporters Thursday morning, IAB President and CEO Randall Rothenberg said one goal of the campaign is to address regulators’ concerns that consumers don’t understand behavioral advertising.
The ad units themselves offer information about online ad techniques. For instance, users who mouse over the “creepy” banner can pull down copy stating that companies don’t use “personally identifiable information” to determine which ads to serve.
Users who click through land on the IAB’s Privacy Matters page, which includes a description of various forms of online advertising, information about cookies (including Flash cookies) and links to opt-out pages.
The portion of the landing page devoted to cookies says they “contain data that allow a Web site to customize content and advertising to your interests but generally do not contain personally identifiable information.” A section with information about geotargeting states that an IP address “reveals nothing personal about you to marketers and websites.”
But privacy advocate Jeff Chester immediately raised questions about such statements. “They are ignoring the growing consensus that cookies and IP addresses are personally identifiable,” says Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy.
Cathy Dwyer, a privacy expert and professor of information systems at Pace University, also questions whether the banners’ headlines are too sophisticated to draw in users. “Even ‘creepy’ itself is a technical term,” she says, adding that it’s mainly industry insiders and observers who use that word in discussions about behavioral advertising.
The FTC said this year in its report about online behavioral targeting that non-personally identifiable information could be used to identify specific users.
In the past, industry groups and observers defined personally identifiable information as names, addresses, phone numbers or other information that could be used to contact an individual directly.
Critics recently moved away from that definition, in part because Web users have been identified based on supposedly anonymous data. The most famous example occurred in 2006, when AOL publicly released search logs showing users’ queries and “anonymized” IP addresses for more than 600,000 users, Within days, one “anonymized” user, Thelma Arnold, was profiled in The New York Times after reporters identified her based on her search queries.
Schematic CEO Trevor Kaufman told reporters Thursday that a test of the campaign in late October and early November yielded a click-through rate of 0.5%. The trial involved 7 million impressions, mainly served on Microsoft’s Hotmail.
Separately, the digital rights group Center for Democracy & Technology also launched a privacy campaign on Thursday — although with a different goal. The CDT is hoping to persuade users to lobby Congress for online privacy legislation. The Web site for the CDT’s “Take Back Your Privacy” campaign enables users to submit concerns directly to the FTC and to send emails to their lawmakers.
first seen on Media Post by Wendy Davis, Yesterday, 6:58 PM
In: Marketing| SEM| User Acquisition
27 Nov 2009Clicks have made us fat and lazy. And when we wind up set in our ways, there’s only one solution – weaning. In this case, we need to be weaned off the click.
That’s what the online marketing world needs right now to improve branding, according to eMarketer and experts it surveyed across the Internet ad business.
In a recent study, eMarketer found that while 57 percent of marketing executives said brand measurement was not holding back online advertising, an astonishingly high 43 percent said it was.
“Clicks and banner ads tell so little of a story,” says Geoff Ramsey, CEO of eMarketer and the author of a recent report on reinventing online brand measurement.
Research from iProspect and Forrester found that Internet users were more apt to search for a product, brand or company – or even type the company’s name into a browser bar – than to click on a promotional ad. That’s why measuring time spent, influence, engagement and responsiveness to ads is more important than measuring the actual click.
“People don’t just see an ad or billboard and do something immediately – it happens over time,” Ramsey says. “What we have to do is the hard work and wean ourselves off the click.”
Of the $25 billion spent on online ads each year, about $7.7 billion is allocated to branding ads, such as display and video. “But unlike search, which is a $12 billion business, we don’t know what that $7.7 billion is doing for us,” Ramsey explains. “If we figure it out, that number will grow. Search and online video are the two engines driving Internet growth, and search has slowed. We really have to figure out the branding component and apply to video or we will be stagnant.”
Working collaboratively to share data points can help. In addition, the solution will likely include attribution modeling, or capturing the data around both online and offline ad exposure and giving each their due. But the answer also lies in an old-school method, one that for better or worse has worked in television for more than 50 years – Gross Rating Point (GRP).
Nielsen is not perfect, yet it has become a common currency and people say we need to embrace the grp to get Internet into the media mix more,” Ramsey says. “If you can’t talk the language of the marketer, which is grp, then you are missing something and not getting on brand marketers’ tables.”
Young-Bean Song, senior director of analytics at Microsoft’s Advertising Institute (formerly Atlas) agrees. He told eMarketer, “I think it’s not having those foundational reach, frequency and GRP metrics. You will never see P&G and Unilever spend more than single digits [in millions] unless we give them reach, frequency and GRPs.”
Ramsey is one of many voices in the industry that has been calling for big change in how Internet marketers evaluate the effectiveness of a campaign. Gian Fulgoni, the chairman of comScore, has also said at MediaPost events that clicks are no longer the Holy Grail of online measurement, with time spent and brand lift being more important metrics. Similarly, Microsoft’s Advertising Institute recently said in a report that conversion should be measured across the entire digital purchase funnel and not merely by the last ad seen or the last click.
Indeed, measurement is the constantly hashed and rehashed topic at industry events, but perhaps the answers lie not in more data but in a better way to capture the interactions consumers have with brands online, relying on some tried-and-true methods, some sharing and some new strategies.
First seen on Media Post by Daisy Whitney
What Does Apples to Apples mean?
Simply put “apples to apples” in this case means you are taking multiple creative that look exactly the same in every way, shape and form except one single variable and testing them against each other. This one single variable is the most important part of the testing methodology and could lead to 25-50% improvement in your marketing campaigns (see below).

Control Creative
So as you can see above all your creative remain the same except for that one variable. In this case the background square highlighting the silhouette of the girl changes and everything else stays the same. Although this seems like a simple example, the testing method is simple by nature. As you can see below one creative is the clear winner with an increase click through rate (CTR) of one hundred and thirty percent, not bad for your first test.

Statistically Relevant Sample Size
The sample size is the number of impressions you run against your creative. Different creative sizes have different statistical relevant thresholds. Here are the thresholds:
425×600 – 500,000 – 750,000 impressions
300×250 – 750,000 to 1 MM impressions
160×600 – 800,000 – 1 MM impressions
120×600 – 900,000 – 1.1 MM impressions
728×90 – 1 MM – 1.2 MM impressions
468×60 – 1 MM – 1.5 MM impressions
In this case you need to test all of your creative at the same volume of impressions. For example: If you have four different creatives measuring 300×250 in size you would run the control creative at 55% while running the other three at 15% till you reach the statistically relevant number above. The reason you keep the control running at a higher level of 55% is to maintain a successful campaign while you test. Just because your testing doesn’t mean you should sacrifice the already proven success of your control, you might end up finding out the control beats all of your tests in the end anyway (this happens quite often actually). If you can’t afford the amount of impressions it takes to run a 4 creative test then just reduce the amount of test creative you run at one time. This will allow you to garner results at a faster rate which will turn into dollars before you know it.
Call To Action
You need to test your call to action just as much as you test different layouts, background colors and button colors. Think about what you want your customer to do:
“Watch Now”
“Buy Now”
“Register Now”
You need to have your call to action very clear and concise so that the customer doesn’t have a chance to forget what you want them to do. Don’t forget when your testing your call to action, you can’t be testing anything else at the same time. You need to isolate one variable at a time or you will never know if it was that change that made the difference.
Landing Page
When you’re creative testing you should send all of your users to the same landing page which is consistent with your creative’s look and feel. Consistency in your messaging along with the same look and feel can increase your conversions up to 35%. Again don’t forget, you can only isolate one variable at a time. If you test landing pages at the same time you are testing creative you will never know if it was truly your creative that made people perform the action you are asking them to perform or was it the landing page? That’s why isolating this one variable at a time method works so well, you know what you changed and you know if that one thing made a difference.
I hope this simple “Apples to Apples” creative testing explanation helps you and your marketing efforts in the future. feel free to post any questions and happy testing.
With over 10 years of experience I am expert in all things online marketing. Here I will share my thoughts on Social Media, Display and Search Marketing along with the art of SEO. Let's Chat!